By Vic Tanner
On July 9, the Republic of Ireland
passed a law against material that is "abusive or insulting in relation
to matters held sacred by any religion". Why would the government of an
enlightened secular country choose to enact a blasphemy law at this
point in history? Though many countries, some of which may surprise
you, still have blasphemy laws on the books, these laws are often vague
to the point of meaninglessness and are seldom enforced. For instance,
the Greek Penal Code defines a blasphemer as "one who publicly and
maliciously and by any means blasphemes God" yet makes no attempt to
clarify who "God" is or what these malicious acts may consist of.
Whether these laws were intended to placate religious individuals or to
protect religious institutions, they accomplish neither.
|
|
By James Zimmerman
You're not going to learn anything new reading this book. But that's not an indictment of the book, no, it's a comment on your age. Disbelief is intelligently designed to appeal to the tween/early-teen crowd, and it does a superb job. Indeed, it is the best book on the topic of disbelief available for young people.
The
author begins right away (well, after an introduction by Tom Flynn) by
assuring young people who may be nervous reading such a book that he
understands their fears. S. C. Hitchcock (writing under a pseudonym for
the safety of his family) tells such readers that, if they take nothing
else from the book, and if they are unable or unwilling to read
anything else, to remember that there is no God. "Religion," he says,
surely striking a nerve with everyone in his intended audience,
"survives and is a huge force in the world because it relies on the
indoctrination of children." It was this observation, Hitchcock noted
in an interview, that drove him to write the book.
|
|
|
By Ryan Sutter
On July 10, Minnesota Public Radio Midmorning discussed the topic "New polls indicate a dim view of U.S. scientific achievement." The polls in question were from the Pew Center and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The short of it is, the vast majority of scientists (97%) accept that life evolved over time from a shared common ancestor but only 61% of the general public believes the same. On the topic of global warming, the divide is even greater. 84% of scientists are convinced that global warming is real and caused by human activity but only 49% of the public agrees.
|
|
|
By George Kane
President's Note: This is a great example of the kinds of social events Minnesota Atheists host. For those who think all we do is talk about atheism and religion, think again! To learn about more events like this, sign up for Atheists Weekly Email.
Whenever possible I select for the fourth Wednesday Reel and Meal a movie of particular interest to the atheist community. A few years ago, Christian parents were objecting to the Harry Potter books for glorifying the occult, and demanding that they be removed from school libraries, and lead actor Daniel Radcliffe has recently revealed that he is an atheist. So when Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince came to Lagoon Cinema in July, it was a natural selection. Ten of us turned out for the movie, after most of us enjoyed dinner across the street at Uptown Drink.
|
|
By Bjorn Watland
The end of June marks the start of our attendance at GLBT Pride Festivals around the state. First, we attend the Twin Cities Pride Festival and Parade, then Rochester, LaCrosse, Duluth, and Mankato. Some atheists are puzzled. Of all the summer festivals, why do we go to so many GBLT Pride Festivals? Our attendance at GLBT Fesivals has become a tradition, largely due to the efforts of founding member August Berkshire. We continue this tradition for several reasons.
First, GLBT Pride events have been very welcoming.
If people, no matter their sexual orientation, are gathered together to
support an oppressed minority, I think that people are more aware of
how to treat everyone fairly.
There are also plenty of GLBT atheists out there who are so exicted to
see our organization supporting their rights, both as an atheist and as
a GLBT person.
Second, I think that the GLBT community and the atheist community have similarities. We are both hated by different religious groups. We both seek respect and understanding. We both can have difficulty with family who don't agree with our identies. We seek social justice and advocate for the rights of a minority.
Members of the GLBT community are also strong supporters of the
separation of church and state and we can use all of the allies we can
in that fight.
Lastly, GLBT Festivals are inexpensive
to attend and a great way to put our money where our mouth is with
regard to supporting equality for all citizens, regardless of sexual
orientation.
I thank you for supporting Minnesota Atheists and our effort to educate the public about atheism.
|
|
By George Kane
On
a Sunday morning at the end of May, Dr. George Tiller, who was well
known as one of the few doctors in the country who performed late-term
abortions, walked into Reformation Lutheran Church in Wichita Kansas,
which he had attended regularly for years. Inside the church, long-time
anti-abortion activist Scott Roeder shot and killed him.
Many
online abortion opponents could not conceal their delight with Roeder's
"street justice." Dr. Tiller had also for years been the object of
incendiary attacks from Bill O'Reilly of Fox News,
which many blame for inciting Roeder to the murder. Abortion opponents
rankle, of course, at the notion that they bear any responsibility for
the criminal violence of extremists like Roeder. They point out that
the mainline anti-abortion organizations denounced Dr. Tiller's murder,
and that few of them would ever engage in violence. Nevertheless, the
argument on which religious opposition to abortion is always based,
that abortion is murder, is inherently inflammatory. If they insist
that Dr. Tiller committed hundreds of murders, they can hardly denounce
his own murder as inappropriate or disproportionate punishment. Their
arguments justify violating the law by appealing to a higher law.
|
|
By Crystal Dervetski
When
you join up with Minnesota Atheists, you are asked two questions: "How
did you hear about Minnesota Atheists?" and "Why did you join Minnesota
Atheists?"
I know, you're an atheist, you're a skeptic, and you're cynical about
these questions. It's totally understandable if it seems like they are
bordering on an intrusion of your privacy. You do not, of course, have
to answer these questions at all. Please keep in mind, though, there
are a few really basic reasons why we'd like to know these two things
about you.
|
|
By Eric Jayne
(editor's note:
This article first appeared in the June 17th edition of the Star Tribune. It is a response to Katherine Kersten's article "Hostility to Religion Bodes Ill for Society," which appeared in the June 7th Star Tribune.
The premise of Kersten's article was that religion, Christianity in
particular, is necessary to keep scientific progress in check. She
argued that without Judeo-Christian beliefs, society would be morally
corrupt and incapable of compassion. )
I
am convinced that there is absolutely no value to the muddled ramblings
of Katherine Kersten. In her recent column, "Hostility to religion
bodes ill for society," she shamelessly blames secular freethought and
atheism for infanticide, the Holocaust and general draconian attitudes
toward social welfare while crediting Christianity for human
compassion. In making her assertion she conveniently ignores the
numerous Bible passages where the bloodthirsty Judeo-Christian God
condones war and ethnic cleansing. In Numbers 31: 17-18, for example,
God actively calls for the killing of male children and the raping of
female children. That's one of the many Bible passages Kersten is
forced to gloss over when she touts that Judeo-Christianity teaches us
"universal standards of right and wrong." Also, since she had brought
up Hitler, I would like to point out to Kersten, and her
atheist-bashing ilk, that the SS belt buckles Nazi soldiers wore during
the Holocaust bared the motto: "Gott mit uns" (God is with us).
Kersten ends her article by suggesting that Social Darwinism is a
legitimate science that promotes the notion of the survival of the
fittest. Therefore, Kersten argues, scientific progress needs to be
constrained by religion so that the poor and vulnerable citizens of
society are protected. Her position might have merit if Social
Darwinism were an actual science, but it's nothing more than
pseudo-science just like astrology and intelligent design. Darwin's
theory of evolution by natural selection is a biological science that
was never intended to be co-opted by the social sciences. In fact,
Charles Darwin wrote that human beings could not "check our sympathy
even at the urging of hard reason without deterioration in the noblest
part of our nature." If Kersten simply understood legitimate science
she probably wouldn't be so afraid of it, and she might even tone down
her spiteful and erroneous anti-secular rhetoric.
|
|
By Crystal Dervetski
On June 20th, Minnesota Atheists met at Lilydale Park in St. Paul
for a fossil hunting adventure. Everyone met outside in the parking
lot, grabbed an information packet about the park and the fossils, and
then made the hike up to the three fossil beds located in the park.
Everyone found something, and had a great time sharing their finds with
one another. Families were out in full force, and even some of the
really tiny ones made the trek up the hill. After the find, everyone
came back down and drank some much needed water and munched on granola
bars. The adults were entertained by a miming of a light saber battle
and a spot-on impersonation of C-3PO, courtesy of a couple of the
youngest fossil adventurers. The weather was beautiful, the fossils
were abundant, and the socialization couldn't be beat!
Mark your calendars for an easy fossil hunt at the Intergroup Secular Labor Day Picnic on Saturday, September 6th in Northfield, MN.
Crystal and Vic will take everyone out to a very easy site after the
picnic that is right next to a road; no hiking involved!
|
|
By Victor Tanner
Is
“Atheist” a strong enough word for skeptical thinkers? It really only
denotes a non-belief in gods and, as we all know, there are many more
wacky things out there. What's stranger than believing that an
invisible friend is watching over your every move? Or than believing
that the world is only 6,000 years old despite the evidence to the
contrary? How about believing that a race of tiny elves that cannot be
seen by human eyes are inhabiting the world all around us?
|
|
|