By Vic Tanner
Believe every word it says, or dismiss it all as bunk, there is no question that the Judeo-Christian Bible is one of the most controversial and perplexing books ever compiled. Conservative Christians commonly claim that all events in it are factual, yet any attempt to study the true historicity of the text is met with suspicion and cries of persecution by the True Believer. Their position is a truly unfortunate one, because critical analysis of the Bible is when it becomes truly interesting. It allows us to unravel the mystery of who the Hebrews were and what goals they were attempting to achieve when writing their scriptures.
When people think of activism, they can sometimes get overwhelmed. A lot of work goes into volunteering for an organization and promoting a cause, but there are many things that you can do to help promote atheism!
First, be positive! There's nothing worse than a negative atheist, mostly because that is exactly the atheist stereotype: doom and gloom, mean-spirited, angry with the world. So don't be! It is actually that easy. Being positive is a choice. Now, I can already hear it; so if there's a medical cause for your orneriness, please go see a doctor. (No hoo-doo vitamin therapy over here, unless it's used in conjunction with an MD.) But seriously, other than that, you just need to shake it off. You will have a more enriched life if you are positive, and you will also help others have a better life just by giving them a smile every once in a while. Being a positive person puts a nice perspective on exactly what an atheist is: the world doesn't fall apart without any gods, so prove that to people! (For those of you who haven't heard the story, my blood type is B+. Awesome.) If you fall into the negativity trap, be aware of it, and make a conscious effort to stop yourself and at least be neutral. Watch how much better people respond to you. A wise man once told me “You can't out-Hitchens Hitchens, so you might as well be nice.” He also said that I sound like Mary Poppins, which I totally acknowledge.
Our Day of Reason celebration in the Rotunda of the state Capitol has made the first Thursday in May a landmark on our annual calendar. While on the steps outside the National Day of Prayer rally proclaimed the nation to be the exclusive property of fundamentalist evangelical Christianity, we stood in opposition to that message, speaking for government that favors no religion over any other, for government that is strictly secular.
During a recent press conference in Turkey, President Obama said that "we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation. We consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values." The religious right political movement exists to oppose this vision of America, and will never abate its efforts to have government declare a privileged position for Christianity. So it comes as no surprise that in May two bills were introduced in Congress for this express purpose.
H. Res. 397 is a resubmission of last year's bill that I wrote about in the February 2008 newsletter, to create ‘America's Spiritual Heritage Week.' Last year H. Con. Res. 888 died in the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, as the committee spent most of the year taking testimony from baseball players who had been accused of taking steroids. This year it may receive more attention and favor from lawmakers, although the bill contains many outright misrepresentations of history.
H. Con. Res. 121 calls for President Obama to declare 2010 as "The National Year of the Bible." Both bills have been referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,
The question is, what should we advocates for secular government do about these bills? Last year my Representative, Betty McCollum, was on the committee. I wrote to her in opposition to H. Con. Res. 888, and in the February 2008 edition of this newsletter urged others to do so. I asked Rep. McCollum to keep this bill in committee, but I received only a noncommittal reply months later, stating that if the bill came to a vote on the floor she would keep my comments in mind. Clearly my carefully drafted letter had only been summarily skimmed by the staffer who responded, and never reached Representative McCollum's attention.
This year there are no Minnesotans on the committee. The Secular Coalition for America provides an editable form email that it will send on request to your representative to oppose the ‘America's Spiritual Heritage Week' bill (http://action.secular.org/t/5367/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27204), but at this writing has posted no mention of the ‘The National Year of the Bible' bill. If a campaign to personally lobby members of Congress is to be effective, it must not only be large, it must be consistent and sustained.
The secular movement is unquestionably gaining strength and momentum. The Freedom from Religion Foundation has surpassed 13,000 members, the Secular Coalition for America has been formed to lobby Congress, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State, American Atheists, and the Atheist Alliance International have all been expanding their activities. A glance at Atheist Weekly E-mail, which is distributed every Friday, shows that our own activities have grown explosively, and that atheists are now a firmly established community.
But we cannot match the numbers of the Christian opponents of the wall of separation, so we cannot rest secure in the loyalty of any legislator. Campaigns to inundate them with phone calls, letters and emails seem futile, because staffers insulate them from constituent correspondence, and because organizing atheists is as likely as herding cats. But our greatest obstacle to influencing such legislation as H. Con. Res. 121 and H. Res. 397 is that the Democratic Party considers us a completely secure constituency.
In December of 2007, the House passed by 372 to 9 a resolution acknowledging "the religious and historical importance of... the Christian faith; and the role of Christians and Christianity in the founding of the United States and in the formation of the western civilization." Symbolic victories like this are enormously important to conservative Christians, and there are few Congressmen who are not eager to at least pay them lip service. But if we are ever to become an effective political force, even symbolic bills must be important to us, too. Atheists are often smug in the superiority of their ideas, as if the battle of public and political opinion were certain to fall in line with the conclusions of science and reason. It is more likely that this culture war will only be won when we want victory as much as the opponents of secularism.
By Crystal Dervetski
On May 17, 2009, Chuck Samuelson, the Executive Director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota (ACLU MN) spoke at the Minnesota Atheists monthly meeting on the ACLU MN's current lawsuit against a charter school in Apple Valley known as TiZA. Mr. Samuelson also engaged the audience with other cases of separation of state and church issues, and a discussion of the difference between these matters in an urban vs. rural setting.
Mr. Samuelson was extremely knowledgeable, articulate, and personable. His speech was both informative and entertaining. The presentation was an eye-opening event for atheists in regards to how even religious groups in the majority have also experienced discrimination in our state.
Minnesota Atheists should be proud to have had a balanced speaker like Mr. Samuelson, and his presentation solidifies MNA's reputation of having wonderful guest speakers present on a wide variety of topics and interests.
When I first met my new friend from Sierra Leone, we quickly got on to the subject of religion. To make a point, he asked me to touch to my nose.
I looked at him without moving. Insistently, he said again, "Point to your nose!"
So, I put my index finger on my nose.
Then he said, "Okay, now point to God."
Well, I didn't know where to put my index finger, so I dropped it back onto my lap. Later into the evening, he described what African animist religions were, but before that, we further explored where "God" was.